3 Reasons Benny Johnson Shouldn’t Call Out Plagiarism: He’s A Plagiarist, He’s A Plagiarist, and He’s A Plagiarist

Joint Post, Uncategorized

By @blippoblappo and @crushingbort

Yesterday morning, Buzzfeed’s “viral politics reporter” and resident ex-College Republican Chair Benny Johnson took the unusual step of calling out another outlet on Twitter for plagiarizing his work, a masterpiece on the socks that George H.W. Bush wears. “Repeat after me,” said Johnson, “copying and pasting someone’s work is called ‘plagiarism[.]’”

 

Johnson didn’t let up on The Independent Journal Review for stealing his socks articles, either:

 

 

The move struck many as odd, because for Buzzfeed, which reportedly valued itself at $1 billion earlier this year, a substantial part of their business model is just that: ripping off others’ content for profit. Time and time again, Buzzfeed “reporters” have either copied and pasted articles or just lifted individual tweets, photos, or other social media without paying a cent to those actually bringing in the pageviews. It doesn’t appear to be an issue of any concern at the top, either—despite recent reports of new “editorial standards,” editor-in-Chief Ben Smith recently told a tweeter who didn’t like their work being appropriated that they could always just “take it down.”

 

But there’s another reason why Benny Johnson’s complaint yesterday should raise eyebrows. A brief dip into the cesspool that is Johnson’s Buzzfeed articles quickly turned up several incidents of Johnson directly lifting from other reporters, Wikipedia, and Yahoo! Answers, a website where people go to ask if they can get pregnant from stepping on a rusty nail. In other words, he plagiarized.

 

Johnson has written 522 articles for Buzzfeed. The following are just three instances where he’s copied someone else’s work without credit:

 

#1: BENNY JOHNSON RIPS OFF U.S. NEWS & WORLD REPORT AND WIKIPEDIA IN AN ARTICLE ON LIVING CONDITIONS ON NORTH KOREA

On April 24, 2013, Benny posted a piece titled, “What Would Your Life Be Like If You Were Born In North Korea?” The piece is a compilation of horrible conditions that residents of North Korea live under, with each item accompanied (in typical BuzzFeed fashion) by a picture scrounged from Google Image Search. But if you take out the pictures, all you’re left with is a bulleted list, the beginning of which closely mirrors the one published two weeks earlier in an article titled “Here’s How Lousy Life Is in North Korea” by U.S. News & World Report’s Rick Newman. Both articles reference the Korea Institute for National Unification’s “Quality of Life of North Korean” report, but it’s clear that Benny repeatedly just appropriated Newman’s reporting and phrasing without giving credit.

 

For example, here’s Newman on the “corn and kimchi” diet the poorest North Koreans live on:

Untitled

And here’s Johnson, lifting the same phrasing:

Untitled

A look at the actual report shows how Johnson’s language clearly came from Newman’s paraphrasing:

Bixo

 

Newman on malnutrition:

Untitled

And Johnson, tweaking the phrasing just enough to confuse the cause of stunted North Korean children:

Untitled

 

Newman on government pay:

Untitled

Johnson, again:

Untitled

 

Newman on North Korea’s medical system:

Untitled

Johnson, lifting again (but adding a picture!):

Untitled

 

Newman on electric power:

Untitled

Johnson, who didn’t even have the courtesy to list Newman’s facts in a different order:

Untitled

 

Here’s Newman on education:

Untitled

Johnson decides to insert some quotes from the KINU report as “added value” to Newman’s reporting:

Untitled

 

From here on in, Benny’s list appears to have stopped ripping off Newman’s article and moved to plagiarizing a number of other sources. Below is text from each source with a date and link, followed by Benny’s “original work.”

 

Country-Data.com, as of April 1, 2012:

Untitled

Johnson:

Untitled

 

Wikipedia, as of April 22, 2013:

Untitled

Johnson is tricky here, splitting the copied text into two chunks:

 

untitled38

untitled39

 

The Guardian, February 22, 2010:

Untitled

Johnson, going far enough to use quotes, but not enough to give a citation:

Untitled

 

 

#2: BENNY JOHNSON COPY-AND-PASTES FROM YAHOO! ANSWERS IN AN ARTICLE ON CITIES DEFYING TERRORISM

On April 22, 2013, Benny posted an article titled “7 Cities That Defy Terrorism.” Besides the standard citations for images, there are no attributions for the text in the piece. Benny listed London as an example of a terror-resilient city, but apparently forgot what terrors were exacted upon it, because he copy-and-pasted a Yahoo! Answers submission about the Blitz.

 

Yahoo! Answers User “Jason B.,” April 2009:

untitled22-3

Johnson:

Untitled

 

 

#3: BENNY JOHNSON PLAGIARIZES A PRESS RELEASE IN AN ARTICLE ON REP. SAM JOHNSON

On February 14, 2013, Benny posted an article titled “The Most Romantic Story In Congress,” which looks like pretty standard BuzzFeed fare. It’s a fluff piece about Texas House Representative Sam Johnson’s relationship with his wife during Vietnam, one so positive it was reposted in entirety on Johnson’s congressional website. But Benny goes beyond the typical BuzzFeed repackaging of friendly source material by copying and pasting entire parts of earlier articles into the piece, unattributed.

Here’s a section of Benny’s article discussing Shirley Johnson’s role in creating the National League of Families:

Untitled

This is a section of text discussing Shirley Johnson’s role in creating the National League of Families  from an October 4, 2006 press release by the office of Rep. Johnson:

Untitled

 

TO CONCLUDE: WE WILL PAY $5,000 TO ANYONE WHO FINDS EDITORIAL STANDARDS AT BUZZFEED

Now to be fair, plagiarism may be small potatoes for someone whose biggest newsworthy accomplishment so far has been giving government officials anonymity to fantasize about murdering a civilian. And the Buzzfeed higher-ups must have a tolerance for his sugar-coated brand of Family Research Council Republicanism as long as it brings in the clicks, because it’s definitely clear Johnson has no fucking clue when it comes to writing an actual news story. But if barely scratching the surface of his inane listicles reveals a history of plagiarism, then maybe it’s time to ask just how deep Buzzfeed’s new “editorial standards” go.

 

 

64 thoughts on “3 Reasons Benny Johnson Shouldn’t Call Out Plagiarism: He’s A Plagiarist, He’s A Plagiarist, and He’s A Plagiarist

    1. Not to defend Buzzfeed (because they’re terrible), but I don’t see much difference between US News copying directly from the KINU report, and Benny Johnson copying indirectly from the same report. It’s not like either of them went out and did actual reporting about conditions in North Korea.

      Like

  1. Buzzfeed is a disgusting site in general. They produce next to 0 original content and instead choose to repackage other people’s and secure themselves a sizeable profit in the meantime, while neglecting to even link back properly. They’ve made an industry out of reusing other people’s content without their permission. How else do you think they can post so many of their lame lists a day?

    Really they should be either creating their own content or asking for permission and then paying for content that they DO use. At the very least, they should be linking back to the original’s source on the page that the content came from, ads and all. That’s still not ideal but at least it isn’t as scummy as they way they run shop now.

    Like

  2. Good on you for investigating, and this article is mostly correct. But Smith is right about the embedded tweet thing. Their web page simply tells your browser where the tweet is located – they are actually linking to your tweet, not stealing it. When a web site embeds your tweet, they’re actually directing people to your twitter account, and you’ll get retweets and follows from it, exactly as if they linked to your website – it’s the same thing.

    Liked by 1 person

  3. You are a sick person and you could do yourself a giant favor by not making it your mission in life to ruin another person’s life, career, and reputation. I dare you to do something better with your life rather than be miserable and bring the world down with you while hide behind your computer screen.

    Like

  4. Um… That’s not really plagiarism if he reworded everything in his own words. That’s called using source material. Did none of you ever write a paper in school? I never plagiarized, but this is absolutely how I wrote those really long papers. I mean granted, we did cite our sources in school, but.. seriously, he re-worded everything, there was no copy and pasting. Plagiarism- to use the words or ideas of another person as if they were your own words or ideas. He didn’t do that.

    Like

Leave a comment